Skip to main content

HUNTERS WINNING THE GAME IN A BIG WAY

"TAKE A DOE" TAKES OFF IN STATE'S 2ND-BEST SEASON EVER

The 2024-25 big game hunting season in Oklahoma showcased another year of remarkable success for hunters across the state. Again, favorable environmental and habitat conditions played crucial roles, creating optimal circumstances for wildlife and the people pursuing them. 

Coupled with robust and healthy wildlife populations, those factors contributed to a substantial combined deer harvest of 128,375 — a figure that underscores the continued vitality of Oklahoma’s big game resources. 

That number ranks this past deer season as No. 2 most-successful in terms of number of animals harvested. The highest harvest for an Oklahoma deer season was 134,158 combined in all 2022-23 deer seasons. 

Equally noteworthy was the continued active participation and conscientious effort put forth by deer hunters to support responsible wildlife management practices. 

A particularly significant highlight in 2024- 25 was the high percentage of antlerless deer harvested, which made up 48% of the total take. This marks a new record for the proportion of antlerless deer in the overall harvest, indicating a widespread understanding among hunters of the importance of managing herd dynamics to prevent overpopulation and ensure ecological balance. And it’s likely that the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation’s “Hunters in the Know … Take a Doe!” public awareness campaign helped generate those results. 

Of the state’s 77 counties, 70 of them reported at least 40% antlerless deer harvest. The goal is a harvest of between 40% and 45% antlerless deer.

 

Image
A boy in hunter orange is holding the the antlers of his recently harvested white-tailed buck.
Boone Bishop took a white-tailed buck in McCurtain County.

 

The seven counties that fell short of 40% antlerless harvest were primarily in the far northwest part of the state, where deer densities are lower and hunting season structures limit antlerless harvest. 

In short, more hunters made more good deer herd management decisions this past season. This deliberate focus on harvesting antlerless deer is more than just a statistic — it reflects a strategic approach aimed at preserving the long-term health and sustainability of Oklahoma’s deer population. By reducing pressure on food sources and helping to maintain stable buck-to-doe ratios, such practices are essential to sustaining thriving wildlife populations for future generations of hunters and outdoor enthusiasts alike. 

For a look at total deer harvest from 2004 to the present, see Figure 1. 

 

Image
A graph showing harvest totals from 2004-2024.

 

Oklahoma’s various firearms hunting seasons played a dominant role in the overall success of the 2024-25 deer harvest. Together, the state’s firearm seasons — which include the 16-day modern gun season, the youth gun season designed to engage and educate young hunters, and the holiday antlerless season focused on strategic population control — contributed a combined harvest total of 79,008 deer. These seasons continue to be the most productive periods for deer hunting in the state, thanks to their accessibility and broad participation among hunters of all experience levels.

Table 1: Harvest by County, Sex, and Method

 

Archery

Gun

Muzzleloader

CountyAntlerlessAntleredAntlerlessAntleredAntlerlessAntleredTotal
Adair170160399303531661,251
Alfalfa13117742840735391,217
Atoka377361668722821792,389
Beaver133395251821421
Beckham14916964466752551,736
Blaine621093054562119972
Bryan25626252147330531,595
Caddo22534469896553732,358
Canadian13020237736934281,140
Carter20226846260428441,608
Cherokee386371647541861942,225
Choctaw28227240245058931,557
Cimarron811879 15121
Cleveland29531639732846721,454
Coal22727141645330771,474
Comanche1281582422903337888
Cotton741031902112022620
Craig23826447755640701,645
Creek354423795705651162,458
Custer631063354471122984
Delaware355399562476811492,022
Dewey7611440858537281,248
Ellis521032934671536966
Garfield9116142048229401,223
Garvin22629554464642701,823
Grady25833771676471692,215
Grant19024879266059622,011
Greer56822462791630709
Harmon53681941831121530
Harper1456124264128487
Haskell168157389325471091,195
Hughes222260441596371061,662
Jackson1331552603201931918
Jefferson15822132931422531,097
Johnston14420434741314511,173
Kay14018049953835431,435
Kingfisher11917346441216391,223
Kiowa911182383181432811
Latimer13214916420726112790
Le Flore298296561471991891,914
Lincoln3463521,01187969872,744
Logan39044876263648822,366
Love130147192254913745
Major8315538451323401,198
Marshall828710414459431
Mayes299305559482621141,821
McClain19222134438025341,196
McCurtain5544089307231362593,010
McIntosh16715528330829671,009
Murray751411752741519699
Muskogee21423537641329691,336
Noble13618156157647531,554
Nowata19818951859634541,589
Okfuskee13718533639834511,141
Oklahoma42452142339626331,823
Okmulgee17622539540733801,316
Osage5676871,5351,6871111524,739
Ottawa20827044742344911,483
Pawnee26124881762555842,090
Payne32438388875247602,454
Pittsburg463493714737962792,782
Pontotoc299392637664591172,168
Pottawatomie393438722767781202,518
Pushmataha4694196565941012122,451
Roger Mills7014353863032491,462
Rogers58056580072476972,842
Seminole21625952752644971,669
Sequoyah239264563482701911,809
Stephens21333248553822551,645
Texas5121096 6129
Tillman1231682492902515870
Tulsa28130430627020321,213
Wagoner33332754043348751,756
Washington20922046052031391,479
Washita44652603021419704
Woods7914934651722481,161
Woodward10115933455917391,209
County Total15,82618,40835,68437,5123,1125,634116,176
OLAP Total4333870000820
WMA Total1,8731,6762,0101,7628076608,788
Tribal Total333333846815911732,591
Grand Total18,46520,80438,54040,0894,0106,467128,375

 

The muzzleloader season, which spans nine days and appeals to those who prefer muzzle-loading firearms, also proved fruitful. Hunters using this method harvested 10,580 deer. Meanwhile, archery season, which offers the longest hunting window and a more solitary, challenging experience, yielded a significant total of 38,787 deer. This reflects both the growing number of bowhunters in the state and the effectiveness of archery as a method of harvest when practiced with skill and patience.

Together, these seasonal breakdowns high- light the diverse range of hunting opportunities available in Oklahoma and emphasize the contributions of all methods in achieving a balanced, sustainable harvest across the state.

Figure 2 presents success rates by hunting method. Figure 3 illustrates each method’s proportional contribution to the total harvest.

Image
Figure 2: Hunter Success Rates 2004-Current

 

Image
Figure 3: Harvest by Method 2024-25

 

Oklahoma distinguishes itself among landlocked states with an impressive range of ecological diversity that few others can match. Spanning from the lush, swampy pine forests of the south-eastern corner to the windswept, sagebrush-dotted shortgrass prairies of the northwest, the state’s varied landscapes create a mosaic of habitats that support a wide array of wildlife. For deer hunters, this means an equally diverse set of hunting experiences — from stalking white-tailed deer through dense bottomlands to glassing open plains for deer movement at long range.

This rich variety in terrain directly influences deer distribution and hunting opportunities across the state. Habitat type, food availability, climate, and land use all contribute to variations in local deer populations, which in turn affect harvest rates from one county to the next.

Furthermore , access to public hunting lands, including but not limited to Oklahoma’s wildlife management areas (WMAs), also plays a significant role in shaping hunting success. To provide a clearer picture of how deer harvests differ by region, Table 1 presents county-level harvest totals, specifically excluding deer taken on public lands such as WMAs. This focus on private-land harvest data offers a more localized perspective on deer abundance and hunting pressure.

The top-three counties by total deer harvest during the 2024-25 season were:

  • Osage County, leading with a total of 4,739 deer harvested, continuing its long-standing reputation as one of the state’s premier deer hunting areas.
  • McCurtain County, yielding 3,010 deer, a testament to the productivity of southeastern Oklahoma’s forested habitats.
  • Rogers County, with 2,842 deer, which reflects both a strong local deer population and active hunter participation.
     
A white tail buck stands proudly and looks at the camera.
Jason Dudley

 

PUBLIC LAND CONTRIBUTION TO DEER HARVEST

Although lands managed by the ODWC — including WMAs and other public properties — make up only about 3% of Oklahoma’s total land area, their contribution to the state’s overall deer harvest is significantly greater than their size might suggest. These public lands serve as vital access points for hunters who may not have private land available,
and they are managed with a focus on habitat quality, wildlife conservation, and hunter opportunity.

Despite their relatively limited footprint, WMAs and other ODWC-managed properties accounted for an impressive 6.9% of the total statewide deer harvest during the 2024–25 season. This disproportionately high contribution highlights the effectiveness of public land management strategies and the value these areas provide to Oklahoma’s hunting community.

Many of these lands feature diverse habitats, active wildlife management practices such as prescribed burns or food plot development, and regulated hunting pressure, all of which contribute to their productivity. In addition, the accessibility of these areas helps ensure that hunting remains an inclusive and equitable outdoor pursuit, regardless of land ownership.

Comprehensive data on deer harvests from public lands are presented in Table 2, offering a closer look at the performance of individual WMAs and illustrating the important role these public resources play in the state’s broader wildlife management goals.

 

A whitetail buck is standing at attention towards the right.
Michael Bonanza

 

Table 2: WMA Harvest by Sex and Method

 

Archery

Gun

Muzzleloader

 
WMA NameAntlerlessAntleredAntlerlessAntleredAntlerlessAntleredTotal
Arcadia Lake WMA3212200248
Altus-Lugert WMA24250514977
Arbuckle Springs WMA1420480046
Arkansas River Coe13420111
Atoka PHA2510126439
Atoka WMA18171340355
Bamberger WMA0112004
Barren Fork WMA0044008
Beaver River (McFarland Unit)11180112
Beaver River WMA461114228
Beavers Bend Sp (Golf Course)1212006
Black Kettle WMA21251531433811391
Blue River Public Hunting & Fishing
Area
1917670049
Broken Bow WMA53462323
Burtschi PFA44110212
Candy Creek WMA1410020127
Canton WMA4825942254153
Canton WRP0011002
Cherokee WMA (GMA Portion)273411171090
Cherokee WMA (PHA Portion)16234302129123
Chickasaw National Recreation Area3821232278119
Cimarron Bluff WMA1200014
Cimarron Hills WMA2210005
Cookson WMA3129581074
Cooper WMA400401247
Copan Coe Parks54531018
Copan WMA2030324485139
Cross Timbers WMA406314400121
Deep Fork NWR11212219863
Deep Fork WMA7112624111392
Dewey County WMA3210118
Drummond Flats WMA76000013
Ellis County WMA757256353
Eufaula WMA405148411817215
Fobb Bottoms WMA7313133039
Fort Cobb State Park0122308
Fort Cobb WMA23209713779
Fort Gibson Coe2722676270
Fort Gibson Waterfowl Refuge0000191332
Fort Gibson WMA1619227885036454
Fort Sill594659444219269
Fort Supply WMA231772310181
Four Canyon Preserve0000101
Ft. Gibson WRP0020002
Gary Sherrer WMA (Bolen Hollow)0020002
Gist WMA1000001
Grady Co. WMA1105007
Grassy Slough WMA0100001
Great Salt Plains State Park73210013
Gruber (CGTC)171413595247202
Hackberry Flat WMA16012919
Heyburn Coe01513111
Heyburn WMA101724153776
Hickory Creek WMA5610102336
Honobia WMA151847311230153
Hugo Lake Coe22102383167
Hugo WMA353154381617191
Hulah WMA2831791032414279
James Collins WMA28396110084
Jap Beaver PFA1000001
John Dahl WMA (Osage)00651214
Kaw Lake Coe2226292279115
Kaw WMA4545169934533430
Keystone Coe35192171184
Keystone WMA644170271914235
Lake Thunderbird State Park59430000102
Lexington WMA32324342236169
Little River NWR962590049
Love Valley WMA3237274376
Lower Illinois River WMA1050006
Major County WMA0100001
McAlester Army Ammunition Plant73727000152
McClellan-Kerr WMA1917272041299
McCurtain Co. WA6412210346
McGee Creek WMA822040034
Mountain Park WMA1450012536
Neosho WMA1110020225
Okmulgee WMA (GMA Portion)459101029
Okmulgee WMA (PHA Portion)64322522
Oologah Lake Coe3018462595133
Oologah WMA614110160258296
Optima National Wildlife Refuge0003003
Optima WMA553100124
Osage WMA - Rock Creek142115326
Osage WMA - Western Wall2126200049
Ouachita WMA (Cucumber Creek)1211117
Ouachita WMA (McCurtain Unit)111432201227116
Ouachita WMA LeFlore13738401620134
Ozark Plateau NWR0210003
Ozark Plateau WMA1012105
Packsaddle WMA2710636492
Pine Creek Coe0041106
Pine Creek WMA8315145449
Pontotoc Ridge Preserve001900019
Pushmataha WMA2344161318105
Red Slough WMA3130100062
Rita Blanca WMA0001102
Salt Plains National Wildlife Refuge135521214105
Salt Plains NWR Wilderness Area011044120
Sandhills WMA39000214
Sandy Sanders WMA215159436
Sans Bois WMA45731525
Schultz WMA1001002
Sequoyah NWR8110031555
Sequoyah NWR (Refuge Island)1400409
Sequoyah Resort Park820014731
Skiatook Coe54551121
Skiatook WMA7333191265
Sparrow Hawk WMA2121006
Spavinaw WMA (GMA Portion)271712182379
Spavinaw WMA (PHA Portion)02972929
Stringtown WMA02321412
Tenkiller Coe1271871550
Tenkiller-B-Cabin WMA13311211
Texoma Coe3837422458154
Texoma Coe (Burns Run)105130019
Texoma Coe (Lakeside)178520032
Texoma/Washita Arm WMA8710120037
Three Rivers WMA3520111603139296
Tishomingo National Wildlife Refuge0731160054
Tishomingo WMA44791025
USDA Grazinglands RL202460032
Vanderwork PFA0202228
Verdigris River Coe199101030
Washita NWR001120013
Waurika Lake Coe88400020
Waurika WMA65455043122
Webbers Fall WMA1000001
Wichita Mts NWR34111010
Wister WMA211255252010143
Wister WRP0100001
Yourman WMA32520113
Grand Total1,8731,6762,0101,7628076608,788

 

ARCHERY SEASON OVERVIEW

Archery hunters again demonstrated strong performance during the 2024-25 deer season, harvesting 38,787 deer. Although this number did not surpass recent record-setting years, it remains a significant contribution to the overall harvest and continues to reflect the growing presence and impact of bowhunters in Oklahoma’s hunting community. 

Importantly, archery hunters maintained a meaningful role in population management efforts. Antlerless deer made up 47% of the total archery harvest, underscoring a continued commitment to balanced herd dynamics. This emphasis on harvesting does is a key aspect of sustainable deer management, helping to regulate population growth and maintain healthy habitat conditions across the state.

Participation in archery season remained strong, with an estimated 109,830 hunters taking part — the highest number recorded since 2021, according to data from ODWC’s annual Game Harvest Survey (GHS). The GHS is a scientifically designed, longstanding monitoring effort to track hunter activity and harvest outcomes across all seasons and methods. 

The archery season, offering the longest continuous window for deer hunting, ran uninterrupted from Oct. 1 through Jan. 15, giving hunters over three months of opportunity. The season’s bag limit allowed for the harvest of up to six deer, with no more than two antlered deer, providing flexibility while still aligning with overall management goals.

To offer additional insight, Figure 4 illustrates long-term trends in archery harvest and hunter participation, highlighting how the season has evolved over time. Figure 5 breaks down the archery harvest by week, offering a closer look at activity peaks and seasonal patterns in deer movement and hunter success.

Image
Figure 4: Archery Hunters and Harvest 2004-2024

 

Image
Figure 5: 2024-25 Archery Harvest by Week

 

MUZZLELOADER SEASON HIGHLIGHTS

The 2024-25 muzzleloader deer season in Oklahoma spanned nine days, from Oct. 26 through Nov. 3. This season appeals to hunters who enjoy the unique challenge of using black powder firearms, and it continues to play a key role in the state’s overall deer management strategy.

Hunters were allowed to harvest up to four deer, with regulations limiting the take to no more than one antlered deer. To further support population control and ensure ecological balance, enhanced bag limits were implemented in several designated antlerless deer zones. These measures were intended to encourage increased harvest of does in areas with higher deer densities. The boundaries and specific regulations for these zones are illustrated in Figure 11.

Compared to previous years, participation and harvest figures showed some fluctuation. According to the GHS, 70,677 hunters participated in the muzzleloader season. These hunters collectively harvested 10,580 deer.

To provide additional insight into hunter activity and harvest trends, Figure 6 presents a daily breakdown of deer harvested throughout muzzleloader season. The data help identify peak harvest days and can inform future management decisions. Figure 7 offers a historical perspective, charting muzzleloader harvest trends dating to 2004, allowing for long-term comparisons and analysis of participation patterns and harvest success over time.

Image
Figure 6: 2024 Muzzleloader Season Harvest by Day

 

Image
Figure 7: Muzzleloader Hunters and Harvest 2004-Current

 

OVERVIEW OF DEER GUN SEASON

Oklahoma’s 16-day deer gun season continues to be a highlight of the hunting calendar. Last year, from Nov. 23 to Dec. 8, hunters were allowed to take up to four deer, with a restriction of one antlered deer, consistent with previous regulations.

The combined gun seasons saw hunters harvest 79,008 deer, with antlerless deer making up 40% of the total. In addition, the youth deer gun season resulted in 4,736 deer harvested, while the holiday antlerless deer gun season added another 10,057 deer to the overall harvest. 

Detailed daily harvest data and long-term trends are illustrated in Figure 8 and Figure 9, and Figure 10 tracks the harvest history of the holiday antlerless season since 2015.

Image
Figure 8: 2023 Gun Season Harvest by Day

 

Image
Figure 9: Gun Hunters and Harvest 2004-Current

 

Image
Figure 10: Holiday Antlerless Deer Gun Season 2015-Current

 

Image
Figure 11: Deer Antlerless Zones

 

ASSESSING DEER AGE STRUCTURE

To effectively monitor the age composition of Oklahoma’s deer herds, ODWC relies on a variety of data sources that provide insight into the biological structure of the harvested population. These sources include voluntary participants in the Deer Management Assistance Program (DMAP), a cooperative program designed to assist landowners and managers in achieving habitat and deer management goals. Additional age data are collected through local meat processors, taxidermists, ODWC-controlled hunts, and public submissions through the department’s “Age My Deer” online tool — an accessible platform that allows hunters to submit photos and information to help determine the age of their harvested deer.

This multi-source approach provides a broad and representative sampling of deer from across the state, allowing wildlife biologists to evaluate the age distribution and overall condition of antlered and antlerless segments of the herd. Understanding the age structure is critical for assessing herd health, identifying management needs, and ensuring the sustainability of the deer population over time.

The information gathered is analyzed to track trends in herd maturity and to evaluate the effectiveness of current harvest strategies, particularly in promoting a balanced age structure with sufficient numbers of older, mature deer. These insights help guide future policy decisions and harvest recommendations.

Figure 12 and Figure 13 illustrate the age breakdown of antlerless and antlered deer, respectively, harvested during the 2024-25 season. These figures provide a visual summary of the distribution across different age classes and offer valuable context for understanding the demographic makeup of Oklahoma’s deer herd.

Image
Figure 12: Doe Age at Harvest 2024-25

 

Image
Figure 13: Buck Age at Harvest 2024-25

 

MULE DEER

Oklahoma’s varied landscapes support a wide range of wildlife, and for deer hunters heading west, that includes the chance to pursue mule deer. These animals are scattered across the westernmost counties of the state, and locating one can be a real challenge. During the 2024-25 season, hunters harvested 209 mule deer — a decrease from the previous year.

In response to varying mule deer populations, ODWC has launched a groundbreaking research initiative. Using GPS collars and partnering with university researchers, managers are aiming to better understand mule deer behavior, fawn survival and movement in Oklahoma. Stay tuned for updates.

Mule deer harvest numbers are shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Mule Deer Harvest by County, Sex, and Method

 

Archery

Gun

Muzzleloader

 
CountyAntlerlessAntleredAntlerlessAntleredAntlerlessAntleredTotal
Beaver462461463
Cimarron8305601077
Ellis0207009
Harper02080414
Roger Mills0003003
Texas130350140
Woodward0003003
Grand Total13162158119209

 

For a recap of the 2024-25 big game seasons and some thoughts about this year’s hunting prospects, tune in at 8:30 a.m. Sept. 21, 2025, on the OETA network. 

Watch Outdoor Oklahoma

ELK SEASON HIGHLIGHTS

Oklahoma’s elk populations continue to show steady growth, both in terms of overall herd size and the geographic range they occupy. While the most substantial concentrations of elk remain in well-established strongholds, such as areas in the southwestern part of the state, sightings and successful harvests are now being reported in counties where elk presence was once rare or even historically absent. This expansion reflects the species’ adaptability and the success of ongoing habitat management and conservation efforts.

Elk hunting opportunities in Oklahoma are structured to ensure sustainable harvest while providing a unique hunting experience. Statewide elk hunting is permitted on private lands, provided hunters obtain written consent from the
landowner, a requirement that helps manage elk-human conflicts and protects landowner rights. In addition to private-land opportunities, the department offers drawings for controlled hunts, which take place on select public lands and are designed to carefully regulate hunting pressure and maintain healthy elk populations.

During the 2024-25 season, hunters harvested a total of 812 elk statewide. The majority of the harvest occurred in the Southwest Zone, which includes Kiowa, Comanche and Caddo counties — areas known for having the most established elk herds and consistent hunting opportunities. But the presence of elk in new areas of the state underscores the species’ ongoing range expansion and highlights the importance of monitoring efforts.

For a more detailed look at elk harvest data, including county-level breakdowns, sex of harvested animals, and harvest method (e.g., archery, muzzleloader or firearm), see Table 4. This summary provides valuable insight into the distribution and dynamics of elk hunting across Oklahoma, supporting data-driven wildlife management decisions.

Table 4: Elk Harvest by County, Sex, and Method

 

Archery

Gun

Muzzleloader

 
CountyCowBullCowBullCowBullTotal
Adair0002002
Beckham0220004
Bryan0001001
Caddo0325160044
Carter0400004
Cherokee2122007
Cimarron0123154943
Coal1000001
Comanche282536415174579
Dewey0400004
Ellis0100001
Grady0010001
Greer0003003
Johnston0200002
Kiowa21604100104
Muskogee0106007
Noble0001001
Texas0101013
Washita0001001
Grand Total33574572401114812

 

PRONGHORN SEASON SUMMARY

Oklahoma’s remarkable ecological diversity not only supports abundant deer and elk populations but also sustains a marginal population of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), a species typically associated with the expansive grasslands of the western United States. In Oklahoma, pronghorn are primarily found in the wide-open rangelands of the Panhandle, which is the easternmost edge of their native range. Their presence here reflects the resilience of the species and the importance of maintaining open prairie ecosystems. 

Due to the limited size and ecological sensitivity of Oklahoma’s pronghorn population, harvest opportunities are highly regulated to ensure the species remains sustainable within the state. Hunting is permitted through a three-pronged management system: over-the-counter archery permits for those seeking a challenging, low-impact method of take; controlled hunt drawings administered by ODWC, which allocate a small number of tags to applicants selected at random; and landowner-issued permits, which allow private landowners within designated pronghorn zones to participate directly in managing localized populations.

During the 2024-25 season, hunters harvested 89 pronghorns in the northwestern areas of the state. While modest in number, this harvest aligns with long-term management goals and reflects the careful balancing act between providing hunting opportunity and preserving a stable, regionally unique population of this iconic plains species.

 

An Oklahoma prongorn stands on a field looking towards the camera.
Stephen Ofsthun

 

Table 5 offers a detailed breakdown of pronghorn harvest data, categorized by county, hunting method, and sex, providing insight into the spatial and demographic dynamics of pronghorn hunting in Oklahoma.

 

Archery

Gun

 
CountyDoeBuckDoeBuckTotal
Cimmaron512201956
Texas11112933
Grand Total623322889

 

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE (CWD) UPDATE

The 2024-25 big game hunting season marked the second consecutive year in which hunters in Oklahoma navigated new challenges following the detection of chronic wasting disease (CWD) within the state’s native wild deer populations. Initially identified in Texas County, and shortly thereafter confirmed in Woodward County, these developments prompted immediate concern among wildlife managers and the hunting community alike, given the serious implications CWD poses for deer health and population sustainability.

In response to this threat, ODWC implemented a series of additional regulations focused primarily on the northwestern region of the state, where CWD detections were concentrated. These regulations centered on restricting the movement of deer carcasses — a critical pathway for the potential spread of the prion disease — to reduce the risk of transmission to unaffected areas. Hunters in the affected counties were required to strictly adhere to specific
carcass transportation guidelines, including prohibitions on transporting certain parts of harvested deer outside designated zones, thereby helping to contain and slow the spread of infectious material.

To further support ongoing disease monitoring and early detection efforts, ODWC established a network of voluntary CWD testing sites, with five freezer drop-off locations strategically placed within Selective Surveillance Areas (SSAs). These sites provided convenient options for hunters to submit samples for CWD testing. During the 2024-25 season, several hunters took advantage of this opportunity, submitting samples that were all ultimately confirmed not detected for CWD, offering cautious optimism about the disease’s current prevalence in these areas.

Looking ahead, the carcass movement restrictions and testing programs are set to continue in SSAs for the 2025-26 season, reflecting a proactive and adaptive approach aimed at safeguarding the health and sustainability of Oklahoma’s deer herds. These efforts, combined with hunter cooperation and ongoing scientific monitoring, are essential components in managing this serious wildlife health issue.

CONCLUSIONS

As I reflect on this report, one message remains consistent: Oklahoma’s deer hunting community is thriving. Hunters are increasingly embracing their role as active managers of the deer population, particularly through sustained efforts to harvest appropriate numbers of antlerless deer. For the fifth consecutive year, the state met its management objective for antlerless harvest, supporting healthy and balanced deer populations.

Additionally, the average age of harvested bucks continues to indicate that hunters are adopting management strategies such as the “Hunters in the Know … Let Young Bucks Grow” philosophy. The quality of Oklahoma’s deer herds has improved markedly, with bucks now regularly featured in prominent hunting publications — a remarkable shift from times when simply encountering deer tracks was noteworthy. These achievements are largely the result of education and voluntary stewardship rather than increased regulation.

Looking ahead, challenges such as urban expansion, disease, overpopulation, and a declining hunting population will require ongoing attention. However, Oklahoma hunters have historically demonstrated resilience and a commitment to responsible wildlife management.

To those preparing for the 2025-26 season, consider mentoring new hunters and sharing knowledge. Remember, every decision made in the field impacts the health and sustainability of the local deer population. 

Best wishes for a successful and enjoyable hunting season.

HUNTERS TAKE 77 BLACK BEARS DURING 2024 SEASONS

Black bear hunters had a great hunting season in 2024, taking a total of 77 (49 male and 28 female) bears, nine fewer than the year before. 

Archery hunters took 74 black bears, while muzzleloader hunters bagged three bears in the bear hunting zone that includes all or portions of 12 counties in southeastern Oklahoma. 

Choctaw Nation wildlife authorities conducted bear check-in for tribal members, accounting for seven (all archery) of the total 77 bears harvested.

The 2024 season was the first year that lifetime license holders were exempt from the purchase of a bear license. Of the 77 bears harvested, 44 were checked in by lifetime license holders. According to the cementum age analysis on premolars collected at check in, the average age of bears harvested in 2024 was observed to be about 3.5 years old.

In a testament to Oklahoma being a popular bear hunting destination, hunters from six other states took a black bear last year: 14 from Texas, one from South Dakota, one from California, four from Louisianan, one from Mississippi, and one from Kansas. Oklahoma hunters took 55 bears.

Bear hunters can expect this fall’s season to be similar to last year’s. Hunters who hunt over bait may find themselves competing with a good mast crop during the upcoming fall season. However, if predictions of extremely hot and dry late-summer weather are correct, a shortage of natural soft-mast food sources could lead to an increase in preseason bait site activity and consequently drive up harvest numbers in 2025.

Wildlife biologists offer these tips for increasing your chances of taking a black bear:

  • Locate an area with fresh bear sign and stay there; you might have to sit all day or hunt multiple days.
  • Start hunting as early in the season as possible.
  • Stay weather-aware. Cold and wet conditions make bears less active.
  • If the weather is hot, consider hunting near a water source.
  • Bears will return to whatever food source is helping them gain the most weight. Acorns, especially from white oaks, are preferred by bears in non-bait areas.
  • Start scouting for hunting spots in September.

All hunters wanting to pursue a black bear must buy either an archery or muzzleloader bear license before the opening dates of each season unless exempt. Archery bear season dates are defined in statute, as running from Oct. 1 until the third Sunday in October. In 2025, archery bear season will close at last legal shooting light on Oct. 19. Archery bear season has no harvest quota.

Muzzleloader bear season will open Oct. 25 and run through Nov. 2 or until the quota of 20 bears is reached. Before hunting, muzzleloader hunters must call for the latest bear quota information at 1-(888) 901-3256.

For more on black bear hunting, consult the Oklahoma Fishing and Hunting Regulations online, in the Go Outdoors Oklahoma mobile app for Apple and Android, or in print free at license dealers statewide.

Image
2024 Bear harvest Male/Female % Figure

 

Image
2009-2024 Bear Harvest Trend Figure

 

2024 Oklahoma Bear Harvest

 

Archery

Muzzleloader

 
CountyMaleFemaleMaleFemaleTotal
LeFlore25181145
Latimer920011
Pushmataha841013
McCurtain33006
Pittsburg20002
Grand Total47272177